SIENTIAPDE-1182
Update tests.ipynb and values.yaml for improved functionality and versioning - Updated execution count in tests.ipynb for reproducibility. - Modified DataFrame creation in tests.ipynb to include a timestamp column and save to CSV. - Changed image tag in values.yaml from "0.4.4" to "0.4.5" for versioning. - Updated GITHUB_BRANCH in values.yaml to reflect the latest branch adjustments.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -403,6 +403,10 @@ class Gates(BaseActivity):
|
||||
|
||||
data = DataFrame(input_data['data'])
|
||||
|
||||
# Create timestamp column from index and reset index
|
||||
data['timestamp'] = data.index
|
||||
data = data.reset_index(drop=True)
|
||||
|
||||
self.debug(
|
||||
f"Prediction store policy: {prediction_store_policy}", metadata)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -410,29 +414,24 @@ class Gates(BaseActivity):
|
||||
prediction_store_policy, metadata)
|
||||
|
||||
# If data has no timestamp, we use the default timestamp and not sort the data
|
||||
if 'timestamp' not in data.columns:
|
||||
self.warning(
|
||||
"Data has no timestamp, using default timestamp", metadata)
|
||||
data['timestamp'] = input_data['timestamp']
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.debug(
|
||||
"Data has timestamp, sorting data by timestamp", metadata)
|
||||
self.info(
|
||||
f"Sorting data by timestamp and applying policy: {policy_type}:{policy_value}", metadata)
|
||||
|
||||
# If policy_type is lts, we need to sort the data by timestamp descending and take the first policy_value rows
|
||||
if policy_type == 'lts':
|
||||
self.debug(
|
||||
"Sorting data by timestamp descending", metadata)
|
||||
data = data.sort_values(by='timestamp', ascending=False)
|
||||
# If policy_type is erl, we need to sort the data by timestamp ascending and take the first policy_value rows
|
||||
elif policy_type == 'erl':
|
||||
self.debug(
|
||||
"Sorting data by timestamp ascending", metadata)
|
||||
data = data.sort_values(by='timestamp', ascending=True)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.error(
|
||||
f"Invalid policy type: {policy_type}, using default policy", metadata)
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"Invalid policy type: {policy_type}")
|
||||
# If policy_type is lts, we need to sort the data by timestamp descending and take the first policy_value rows
|
||||
if policy_type == 'lts':
|
||||
self.debug(
|
||||
"Sorting data by timestamp descending", metadata)
|
||||
data = data.sort_values(by='timestamp', ascending=False)
|
||||
# If policy_type is erl, we need to sort the data by timestamp ascending and take the first policy_value rows
|
||||
elif policy_type == 'erl':
|
||||
self.debug(
|
||||
"Sorting data by timestamp ascending", metadata)
|
||||
data = data.sort_values(by='timestamp', ascending=True)
|
||||
else:
|
||||
self.error(
|
||||
f"Invalid policy type: {policy_type}, using default policy", metadata)
|
||||
raise ValueError(
|
||||
f"Invalid policy type: {policy_type}")
|
||||
|
||||
data = data.head(int(policy_value))
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ class MLFlowRepository():
|
||||
"""
|
||||
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
'success': True,
|
||||
'content': self.model_serving.get_cached_transform(
|
||||
@@ -67,12 +68,15 @@ class MLFlowRepository():
|
||||
- dict: A dictionary containing the predicted data.
|
||||
"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
|
||||
input_index = data.index
|
||||
start_time = datetime.now()
|
||||
data = self.model_serving.get_cached_predict(
|
||||
model_name, data, model_retention)
|
||||
|
||||
end_time = datetime.now()
|
||||
data = pd.DataFrame(data, columns=['prediction'])
|
||||
data.index = input_index
|
||||
data['response_time'] = (end_time - start_time).total_seconds()
|
||||
|
||||
return {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user